Common Mistakes in Setting Out & How to Avoid Them

The setting out is an essential first step in any construction project. Although it may not be the most glamorous aspect of the work, it serves as the foundation for everything that comes after. It’s similar to starting a relay race with your team facing the wrong way if you set out incorrectly. Even if you put in a lot of effort, you will still veer off course.

As surveyors and site engineers, we all know how much pressure sits on this one stage. You’re often the first on site, the clock is already ticking, and everyone’s waiting on you to mark those all-important points. However, mistakes in setting out continue to occur despite years of experience. Sometimes it’s a communication breakdown, sometimes it’s a technical problem, and sometimes it’s just human error.

The good news? With a little planning, cooperation, and attention to detail, almost every typical setting out error can be prevented. The most common mistakes that happen on the job site will be discussed in this article, along with their causes and workable solutions. You’ll also get an idea of how Castle Surveys manages these difficulties by utilising cutting-edge tools, sensible protocols, and a good dose of common sense.

Why Accuracy in Setting Out Matters

When you think about it, setting out isn’t just marking positions on the ground – it’s translating a design from paper (or screen) into reality. Every millimetre matters. Small mistakes can become major issues when a single misplaced point throws off an entire structure.

Have you ever had to redo a section after realising that a column or wall wasn’t aligned properly? Isn’t that annoying? For everyone involved, not just the surveyor. Rework entails wasted time, materials, and occasionally a good deal of uncomfortable client explanations. Financial difficulties can quickly result from delays, and before you know it, a straightforward calculation error has cost thousands of dollars.

Getting it right the first time is a source of pride in addition to financial gain. Proper planning establishes the project’s overall tone. It keeps the job going smoothly, reassures the client, and instills confidence in the construction team. Here, accuracy truly is crucial.

REQUEST A QUOTE

Common Setting Out Mistakes on Site

Let’s dive into the real-world stuff, the mistakes we see time and again on construction sites. You’ll probably recognise a few. The important bit is knowing what causes them and how to stop them before they happen.

Misreading or Misinterpreting Drawings

If you’ve been on site long enough, you’ve likely encountered drawings that made you scratch your head. Maybe the dimensions didn’t quite add up or the detail wasn’t clear. Misreading or misinterpreting drawings is one of the most common sources of setting out errors.

I’ve seen this happen when teams rush to get started, assuming they fully understand the plans, only to realise halfway through that a section was out of scale or that they were working from an older revision. Nobody enjoys having to explain that certain points need to be moved due to a drawing error.

The main point is that design drawings are frequently altered in the early phases of a project and are not always flawless. Some elevations may not match the grid references established by the architect, or tolerances may be miscalculated. When working under pressure, even the most skilled engineers can make mistakes.

How to stay away from it:

Make sure you are using the most recent version of the drawing before beginning any setting out task. It may seem simple, but the frequency with which teams share out-of-date information is astounding. Before beginning, have a brief review meeting to ensure that everyone is aware of the important dimensions and levels. Speak up if something seems unclear. It can save days of rework to ask one question early on.

Equipment Calibration Errors

When properly calibrated, survey equipment is incredibly accurate. When it’s not, the problems start. One of those subtle issues that may go unnoticed until it’s too late is equipment calibration errors.

Consider it similar to operating a vehicle with slightly misaligned wheels. You’ll stray just enough to get lost, but it still functions. This also applies to GNSS receivers or total stations that haven’t been serviced or inspected in months.

Calibration is a ritual for us at Castle Surveys. The team completes a brief verification checklist prior to any significant setup to ensure that everything matches control points. When you’re up to your ankles in mud on the job site, it’s much harder to identify problems than in the yard or office.

How to avoid it:

Stick to a strict calibration schedule. Don’t just rely on the manufacturer’s recommendation. Do your own in-house checks whenever you move equipment between sites, and always carry out a two-point check against known coordinates before setting out anything new. If you use GNSS, confirm your correction service is active and accurate – it’s surprising how easily this detail can slip.

Poor Communication and Handover

This is a classic that occurs on sites of all sizes. A job can be made or broken by communication – or lack thereof. Small misunderstandings can quickly get out of hand when a foreman assumes the control points are unchanged or when the surveyor wrapping up the night shift fails to leave thorough notes.

Because the handover documentation had not been updated, I recall a project where two teams used completely different control networks. The outcome? The building was precisely square, but it was ten centimetres off. Unravelling it took days.

Building is a team sport. Information flows must be coordinated by engineers, contractors, designers, and managers, particularly when personnel are arriving and departing. Precision is lost if information isn’t communicated clearly.

How to stay away from it:

Maintain a central location for all setting out data documentation, ideally a shared digital environment. To make it easier for others to follow, record each coordinate, revision, and note in standardised formats. Ten hours of correction work can be avoided with a ten-minute handover briefing in between shifts. Additionally, record it while it’s still fresh rather than depending solely on memory.

Inadequate Site Preparation

The number of setting out teams that arrive prepared to work only to discover that the site isn’t quite ready for them is astounding. Benchmarks may have been disturbed by other trades, control points may be hidden, or the ground may not be ready for setup. This lack of planning frequently results in rushed compromises and avoidable mistakes.

A project where a painter had sprayed over the control points the day before the survey team arrived stands out in my memory. Yes, it was a simple mistake, but before anyone could begin work, they had to recalculate and set up completely new stations.

How to stay away from it:

Verify what is ready and what is not before going to the site. Make a brief reconnaissance to ensure that reference points are stable, visible, and unobstructed. If you’re working in an area where line of sight could be problematic – dense scaffolding, for instance – think about using GNSS to create independent checks or alternative setups. A few minutes of planning can mean the difference between a successful morning and solid accuracy.

Human Error and Oversight

Everybody has been there. You’re juggling five tasks at once halfway through a hectic day when all of a sudden something doesn’t feel quite right. That persistent suspicion that you might have forgotten a correction factor or entered the incorrect prism height. Although human error is unavoidable, it is also controllable.

This is largely due to fatigue. Concentration can be dulled by long shifts, inclement weather, or working under pressure. Even the most skilled surveyor can make a tiny mistake, and on a high-precision job, that’s all it takes for a mistake to occur.

The best teams are not the ones who never make mistakes; rather, they are the ones who learn from them fast.

How to stay away from it:

Include a verification step whenever you can. Before approving them, have a second engineer verify important details or take a moment to remeasure crucial coordinates. Promote open communication so that reviewing someone’s work is viewed as a good practice rather than a criticism. and take pauses. Errors that can be prevented are caused by fatigued eyes and overworked minds.

How to Avoid Setting Out Mistakes

Half the fight is figuring out where things go wrong. The other half is developing routines and practices that reduce the likelihood of errors in the first place. Let’s examine some tried-and-true strategies for maintaining high accuracy and low stress.

Double-Check All Plans and Specs

Although it may seem obvious, a lot of mistakes are caused by failing to cross-reference drawings and specifications before visiting the site. Spend some time reading and comprehending each design note before you even pick up the tripod.

To make design intent, key levels, and grid references clear, hold pre-construction briefings. Verify that the site’s control ties into the design model and that everyone is using consistent coordinate systems. Test it if you think something is off. Finding misalignments on paper is preferable to doing so in person.

Making a basic setting out checklist is, in my opinion, one of the best things you can do. It only needs to be a straightforward, repeatable procedure that addresses communication routes, instrument setup, control checks, and drawing verification. Errors are prevented by consistency.

Use the Right Tools for the Job

Survey equipment is not an exception to the rapid evolution of technology. Accuracy and efficiency can be significantly increased by using the appropriate set of instruments.

Total stations, for example, are excellent for precise linework, but they may not work well in places with long baselines or poor visibility. In contrast, GNSS surveys provide rapid coverage and flexibility, particularly when combined with dependable RTK correction. Additionally, an increasing number of teams are expanding their toolkit to include laser scanners; tools such as SLAM devices and mobile mapping systems offer useful context and help confirm that everything actually fits where it should.

Here, maintenance is the most important factor. The care you give your instruments determines how dependable they are. If you want consistent results, regular servicing and calibration are essential. Always keep extra batteries on hand, have backup data options, and don’t assume that your setup from yesterday is still ideal today.

Implement Robust Quality Checks

Even though quality control is the best safeguard against making mistakes, it is frequently disregarded when deadlines are tight. By putting systematic checks in place, errors are identified early and are not found after the concrete has been poured.

Establish internal verification procedures so that, prior to final approval, one surveyor reviews the work of another. If that isn’t feasible, overlay setting out data against the design model using digital comparison tools. Use the automated error detection and reporting features found in many contemporary total stations and software programs. They are intended to assist.

Additionally, it is worthwhile to log everything digitally. Measurement history, instrument settings, and adjustment records can be automatically stored by a basic tablet or field data collector. In addition to giving you a clear audit trail in the event that problems later arise, this type of traceability fosters client trust.

Maintain Clear Site Communication

When everyone is in agreement, projects go more smoothly. Setting out is no different. Errors are prevented and teams are better able to adjust when circumstances change – which they always will – when there is clear and consistent communication.

Utilise shared digital platforms for data coordination, network control, and drawing management. Finding out that half of the team was using version six of a plan while the other had version eight is the worst thing that can happen. You can identify new information before work starts with daily briefings or even brief stand-ups.

Visual reporting is another tip that I’ve seen work incredibly well. Use annotated screenshots or marked-up photos to show where points have been added or changed instead of lengthy text updates. It makes it easier for everyone to comprehend exactly what has been done, including subcontractors and site managers.

Additionally, keep in mind that communication is more than just data. It also has to do with attitude. Promoting transparency enables people to speak up when they notice something that doesn’t seem right.

How Castle Surveys Ensures Accurate Setting Out

We’ve spent years honing our setting out services at Castle Surveys. We don’t just strive for precision; it’s ingrained in our culture. Our team uses state-of-the-art technology and decades of field experience to make sure your project gets off to a good start and continues to do so.

We employ GNSS systems, 3D laser scanners, and calibrated total stations to attain millimeter-level accuracy in all kinds of projects, from infrastructure and residential developments to commercial buildings. Every job is subjected to a structured QA/QC process that includes senior engineers’ final sign-off, on-site control checks, and client design data verification.

Our strategy is based on teamwork. To guarantee that information is freely shared between surveyors, contractors, and project managers, we collaborate closely with site teams. In addition to avoiding misunderstandings, this increases assurance that what is depicted on paper is precisely what is constructed on site.

We mean it when we refer to “the latest technology.” We’ve made significant investments in tools that improve accuracy and transparency, from cloud-based coordination platforms where clients can view and interact with real-time progress to mobile mapping and SLAM systems for capturing high-detail environments.

Therefore, we’ll ensure that everything is done with dependability, accuracy, and professionalism from the start, whether you’re laying out infrastructure, steelwork, or foundations.

Getting It Right the First Time

It’s obvious by now that setting out errors are costly, time-consuming, and typically avoidable in addition to being annoying. It’s not all bad news, though. Actually, there is a lot of room for improvement if you adhere to a few specific guidelines: be well-prepared, maintain open lines of communication, double-check everything, and never become complacent.

When a job is done perfectly, there is genuine satisfaction. You know the effort has paid off when the first pour goes smoothly, the structure ties in perfectly, and everyone is nodding rather than freaking out.

So, the next time you’re out on site, take an extra few minutes to double-check your setup, confirm your drawings, or review that control point. You’ll thank yourself later.

And if you’d rather take the worry out of it altogether, you know where to find us.

Need help getting your setting out process right the first time?

Get in touch with Castle Surveys for reliable, high-precision site engineering and setting out services. Our team will keep your project on track from start to finish.

CONTACT US

This post was written by Paul Jackson